Case Study

Modernizing WordPress Deployment with CI/CD, Docker, and Composer

Nerdience Technologies Private Limited · www.nerdience.com

Introduction

This case study explores how we modernised a WordPress deployment pipeline using Composer, Docker, and Bitbucket Pipelines, deployed on DigitalOcean with monitoring via Site24x7. We introduced environment separation with Non-Production and Production setups, enabling controlled testing, automated deployments, and safer release workflows, all while keeping costs lean using DigitalOcean’s Droplets and Managed MySQL.

Client Details

We supported a Europe-based software development company in successfully modernising their WordPress environments. Our engagement focused on building a robust, automated deployment pipeline and implementing infrastructure best practices, enabling their team to ship updates confidently and securely.

Pain Point / Problem Scenario

The legacy setup involved a single WordPress instance running on a VPS with manual updates and plugin management. Several challenges emerged:

  • No separation between staging and production: any mistake affected live users
  • Manual plugin updates and WordPress core changes led to downtime
  • No rollback mechanism or deployment visibility
  • Lack of automated testing or code quality control
  • Minimal monitoring—most issues were caught post-incident
  • High developer onboarding time due to inconsistent environments

Solution

Overview

Tool/PlatformPurpose
DockerContainerized WordPress environment
ComposerDependency management for WP core/plugins
Bitbucket PipelinesCI/CD automation
SonarQubeCode quality checks for custom plugins
Site24x7Endpoint and server monitoring
DigitalOceanHosting with Droplets + Managed MySQL

Environment Structure

We introduced two isolated environments:

Non-Production Environment

  • URL: https://uat.domain.com
  • Hosted on a separate Droplet
  • Connected to a staging MySQL DB
  • Auto-deployed from the develop branch
  • Used for internal QA, content testing, and stakeholder review
  • Exposed to SonarQube scans via Bitbucket Pipelines
  • Monitored via Site24x7 (uptime, performance, functional health endpoints)

Production Environment

  • URL: https://www.domain.com
  • Hosted on a separate Droplet with more resources
  • Connected to a Managed MySQL production DB
  • Deployed from the main branch after approvals and UAT
  • Secure environment: no direct changes, everything goes through CI/CD
  • Production-grade monitoring, backups, and health checks via Site24x7

Architecture Diagram

Architecture Diagram
High-level view of environments, CI/CD, and monitoring.

Deployment & Workflow

Project Structure

/
├── docker-compose.yml
├── .bitbucket-pipelines.yml
├── composer.json
├── composer.lock
├── web/
│   ├── wp/                # WordPress core (via Composer)
│   └── wp-content/
│       ├── plugins/       # Custom plugins
│       └── themes/        # Custom themes
└── custom-plugins/

Bitbucket Pipelines Configuration

pipelines:
  branches:
    develop:
      - step:
          name: Deploy to Non-Prod
          script:
            - composer install --no-dev
            - docker-compose -f docker-compose-uat.yml up -d --build
            - echo "Deployed to UAT"
    main:
      - step:
          name: Deploy to Production
          trigger: manual
          script:
            - composer install --no-dev
            - docker-compose -f docker-compose-prod.yml up -d --build
            - echo "Deployed to Production"
  • Deployments to UAT are automated on push to develop.
  • Production deployments are manual (triggered only after UAT approval).

Code Quality

  • Custom plugins in wp-content/plugins/ were scanned using SonarQube CLI.
  • Integrated into Bitbucket Pipelines before every deployment.
  • Static analysis helped detect vulnerabilities and bad coding practices.

Monitoring with Site24x7

LayerMonitoringDetails
EndpointHealth checks/wp-json/health-check/v1/status
Infra-levelServer & DockerCPU, Memory, Disk, Docker status
AlertingMulti-channelEmail, Slack, and SMS notifications

Site24x7 allowed proactive action before customers noticed issues.

Cost-Effective Hosting on DigitalOcean

ComponentEnvironmentServiceCost Estimate
Web ServerNon-Prod2vCPU, 2GB Droplet$12/month
Web ServerProduction4vCPU, 8GB Droplet$48/month
MySQL DatabaseNon-ProdManaged MySQL (1GB)$15/month
MySQL DatabaseProductionManaged MySQL (2GB+)$30/month
MonitoringBothSite24x7 (Free/Basic)Free – $9/month

Total monthly cost: ~$100 for two environments, significantly less than comparable AWS or GCP setups with managed services and monitoring.

Benefits

AreaImprovement
DeploymentCI/CD controlled, rollback-safe deployments
Staging/UATSafe testing environment before production
Dependency MgmtComposer enforces consistent plugin/core versions
SecurityNo direct access needed for deployments
Code QualitySonarQube ensures cleaner custom plugin code
MonitoringFull visibility and alerts through Site24x7
Cost EfficiencyScalable infra under $100/month with two environments

Conclusion

By adopting a modern deployment workflow using Composer, Docker, Bitbucket Pipelines, and DigitalOcean, we transitioned WordPress from a legacy monolith to a maintainable, automated, and secure application. With clear environment separation and monitoring, we achieved faster deployments, better testing discipline, and high confidence in production changes—all while remaining budget-conscious.

Interested in similar results?

Let’s discuss how Nerdience can transform your digital infrastructure with modern solutions.

Contact Us →